Diamond S.J. Enterprise, Inc. v. City of San Jose

Good Law
100 F.4th 1059
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202420-15085California8,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIAMOND S.J. ENTERPRISE, No. 20-15085 INC., DBA S. J. Live, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:18-cv-01353-

LHK

v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, OPINION

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2021 Submission Vacated April 25, 2022 Resubmitted August 28, 2023 San Francisco, California

Filed April 30, 2024

Before: Jacqueline H. Nguyen and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Timothy M. Burgess,* District Judge.

* The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. DIAMOND S.J. ENTER., INC. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE

Opinion by Judge Nguyen; Dissent by Judge Collins

SUMMARY**

First Amendment/Prior Restraint

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of plaintiff Diamond S.J. Enterprise’s claims, and its summary judgment for the City of San Jose, in Diamond’s action alleging First Amendment and due process violations when the City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.