Agustin Ramirez v. Martin Navarro

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202423-55112California1,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AGUSTIN RAMIREZ; AGUSTIN No. 23-55112 RAMIREZ, Jr.; ANTHONY RAMIREZ, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-02408-SP Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN NAVARRO; DOES, 1-10,

inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sheri Pym, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and MENDOZA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Agustin Ramirez, Agustin Ramirez, Jr., and Anthony Ramirez

(“the Ramirez family”) appeal the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of Martin Navarro (“Navarro”) on the Ramirez family’s claims

under the Lanham Act and California state law. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court held…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.