Douglas Pell v. Amy Nunez
99 F.4th 1128
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202423-55188California4,227 words
Opinion
Opinion
Ikuta, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOUGLAS MERCER PELL, No. 23-55188
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-03732- v. MWF-RAO
AMY NUÑEZ, Director of Admissions, State Bar of California, OPINION
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2024* Pasadena, California
Filed April 30, 2024
Before: Richard C. Tallman, Sandra S. Ikuta, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). PELL V. NUÑEZ
SUMMARY**
Fourteenth Amendment/California State Bar
The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s dismissal of a law student’s action against the California State Bar’s Director of Admissions alleging violations of the Fourteenth Amendment and California’s Unruh Act, and remanded. The State Bar summarily denied plaintiff’s petition for a hearing to…