Vinod Sharma v. Hsi Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-16614California474 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VINOD SHARMA; VIJAY L. SHARMA, No. 22-16614
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00928-TLN-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION TRUST
2007-1; HSI ASSET SECURITIZATION
CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Vinod Sharma and Vijay L. Sharma appeal pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims arising from
a foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the…