Vinod Sharma v. Hsi Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-16614California474 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINOD SHARMA; VIJAY L. SHARMA, No. 22-16614

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00928-TLN-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION TRUST

2007-1; HSI ASSET SECURITIZATION

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Vinod Sharma and Vijay L. Sharma appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims arising from

a foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.