Isaac Rodriguez v. Target Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-16436California498 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ISAAC JUDE RODRIGUEZ, No. 22-16436
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01814-DWL v.
TARGET CORPORATION, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Isaac Jude Rodriguez appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his Title VII employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment, and for an abuse
of discretion the application of the laches doctrine. In re Beaty, 306 F.3d 914, 921
(9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The…