Isaac Rodriguez v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-16436California498 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISAAC JUDE RODRIGUEZ, No. 22-16436

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01814-DWL v.

TARGET CORPORATION, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Isaac Jude Rodriguez appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his Title VII employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment, and for an abuse

of discretion the application of the laches doctrine. In re Beaty, 306 F.3d 914, 921

(9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.