Francisco Merino v. Vivian Vuong

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-16746California298 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO MERINO, No. 22-16746

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00826-KJM-DMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

VIVIAN VUONG,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Francisco Merino appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Mangiaracina

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Penzone, 849 F.3d 1191, 1195 (9th Cir. 2017). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.