Francisco Merino v. Vivian Vuong
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-16746California298 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANCISCO MERINO, No. 22-16746
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00826-KJM-DMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
VIVIAN VUONG,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Francisco Merino appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Mangiaracina
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Penzone, 849 F.3d 1191, 1195 (9th Cir. 2017). We…