Dave Erlanson, Sr. v. Usepa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-35894California216 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVE WAYNE ERLANSON, Sr., No. 22-35894
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00091-DCN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Dave Wayne Erlanson, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
against the United States Environmental Protection Agency. We review de novo,
Prather v. AT&T, Inc., 847 F.3d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir. 2017), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed Erlanson’s action…