Dave Erlanson, Sr. v. Usepa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202422-35894California216 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVE WAYNE ERLANSON, Sr., No. 22-35894

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00091-DCN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Dave Wayne Erlanson, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

against the United States Environmental Protection Agency. We review de novo,

Prather v. AT&T, Inc., 847 F.3d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir. 2017), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed Erlanson’s action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.