Ruby Bradley v. County of Sacramento Dep't of Human Assistance

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBY BRADLEY, No. 23-15569

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02419-DAD-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN

ASSISTANCE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Ruby Bradley appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

her action alleging race discrimination, failure to prevent discrimination, and

retaliation under Title VII and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“FEHA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Manatt v. Bank of Am.,…