Rogelio Ruiz v. J. Orozco
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202423-15455California326 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 23-15455
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00048-AWI-GSA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. OROZCO, Correctional Officer; N.
HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Rogelio May Ruiz appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of
discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…