Rogelio Ruiz v. J. Orozco

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202423-15455California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 23-15455

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00048-AWI-GSA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

J. OROZCO, Correctional Officer; N.

HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Rogelio May Ruiz appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.