Mustafa Ansari v. Department of Employment, Training and Rehab

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUSTAFA ANSARI, No. 23-15718

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00561-GMN-NJK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT,

TRAINING AND REHABILITATION;

SHANNA JUDIE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Mustafa Ansari appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his mandamus action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1361. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the elements of mandamus are

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). satisfied. Johnson v. Reilly, 349 F.3d 1149, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We may affirm

on any…