United States v. Erin Lafferty

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202423-35067California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35067

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01522-RAJ-BAT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ERIN M. LAFFERTY,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

KING COUNTY; WELLS FARGO BANK;

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;

FANNIE MAE; SEATTLE SAVINGS

BANK,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Erin M. Lafferty appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment for the

United States in its action to reduce to judgment federal income tax assessments

against Lafferty for tax years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2010, and to foreclose on

federal tax…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.