Lance Williams v. D. Lacroix
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202423-15751California294 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS, No. 23-15751
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00513-DJC-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
D. LACROIX, Correctional Officer,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Lance Elliot Williams, a former California state prisoner, appeals pro se
from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after
denying Williams’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C.…