Merese Prospere v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202420-72153California585 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 1 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MERESE PROSPERE, No. 20-72153

Petitioner, Agency No. A209-873-470

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: SILER,** BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Merese Prospere, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an

order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of a

final order of removal issued by an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying her

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), and we

deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.