In Re: Peter Szanto v. Candace Amborn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202422-35207California426 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: PETER SZANTO, No. 22-35207
Debtor. D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01841-SI District of Oregon, Portland _______________
PETER SZANTO, MEMORANDUM*
Appellant,
v.
CANDACE AMBORN, Chapter 7 Trustee,
Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Court Judge
Submitted May 1, 2024**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Peter Szanto appeals pro se from the District Court’s judgment affirming the
Bankruptcy Court’s default judgment against Yankee Trust in an Adversary
Proceeding. We review the District Court’s decision on appeal from the Bankruptcy