In Re: Peter Szanto v. Candace Amborn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202422-35207California426 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PETER SZANTO, No. 22-35207

Debtor. D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01841-SI District of Oregon, Portland _______________

PETER SZANTO, MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

CANDACE AMBORN, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Court Judge

Submitted May 1, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Peter Szanto appeals pro se from the District Court’s judgment affirming the

Bankruptcy Court’s default judgment against Yankee Trust in an Adversary

Proceeding. We review the District Court’s decision on appeal from the Bankruptcy

Court de novo, applying the same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.