Denise Palmer v. Martin O'Malley

Bad Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202422-16448California496 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENISE LEONA PALMER, No. 22-16448

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00190-DLR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 25, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Denise Palmer appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of her

application for Social Security benefits.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order

affirming a denial of Social Security benefits and may reverse when the decision is

not supported by substantial evidence or is based upon legal error. Woods v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Kijakazi, 32 F.4th 785, 788 (9th Cir. 2022). Where the evidence is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.