Roberts
United States v. Roberts
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 23-345 23-347 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:22-cr-00377-AB-1 v. 2:20-cr-00554-AB-
MEMORANDUM*
ALEX SCOTT ROBERTS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024 **
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Alex Scott Roberts appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 85-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for stalking, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A(A)-(B) and 2261(b)(5), and cyberstalking, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.…