Roberts

United States v. Roberts

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202423-347California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 23-345 23-347 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:22-cr-00377-AB-1 v. 2:20-cr-00554-AB-

MEMORANDUM*

ALEX SCOTT ROBERTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024 **

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Alex Scott Roberts appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 85-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for stalking, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A(A)-(B) and 2261(b)(5), and cyberstalking, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.