Davis

United States v. Davis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202423-917California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-917 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:98-cr-00114-KJM-AC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

D'ANGELO DOMINICO DAVIS, AKA Deangelo Domingo Davis,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

D’Angelo Dominico Davis appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his third motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). abuse of discretion, see United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021),

we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.