Bunnell

United States v. Bunnell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202423-1598California384 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1598 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:14-cr-00119-DGC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES WILLIAM BUNNELL II, AKA

Charles Bunnell II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Charles William Bunnell II appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 36-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, see Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2), and we therefore deny Bunnell’s request for oral argument. Bunnell contends the district court erred by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.