Escalona Hernandez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202423-1260California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE ESCALONA HERNANDEZ, No. 23-1260 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-323-878 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Felipe Escalona Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming an asylum officer’s

negative reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review an IJ’s negative reasonable fear determination for substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). evidence. Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). We

review de novo claims of due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.