Ventura

United States v. Ventura

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202423-2653California308 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2653 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00707-MTL-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL PERALTA VENTURA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Peralta Ventura appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

(b)(1)(B)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Peralta

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ventura’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.