Sakhanskiy

United States v. Sakhanskiy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202423-2092California358 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2092 D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00160-TLN-AC-2 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LARISA SAKHANSKIY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Larisa Sakhanskiy appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United

States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Sakhanskiy sought compassionate release on the basis of her serious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.