United States v. Francisco Lucas, Jr.
101 F.4th 1158
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 202422-50064California3,074 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50064
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:21-cr-00017- v. JVS-
FRANCISCO LUCAS, Jr., AKA Choko, AKA Francisco Lucas, OPINION
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted En Banc January 23, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed May 2, 2024
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Consuelo M. Callahan, Sandra S. Ikuta, Morgan Christen, Mark J. Bennett, Bridget S. Bade, Kenneth K. Lee, Lucy H. Koh and Holly A. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Chief Judge Murguia SUMMARY*
Criminal Law
Vacating a sentence and remanding, the en banc court held that clear and convincing evidence is not required for factual findings under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, even when potentially large enhancements are at stake; fact- finding by a preponderance of the evidence is sufficient to satisfy due process at sentencing.…