United States v. Muhammed Tillisy
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 202422-30144California1,506 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30144
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00269-RSL-1 v.
MUHAMMED ZBEIDA TILLISY, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30151
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:13-cr-00310-RSL-1 v. 2:13-cr-00310-RSL
MUHAMMED ZBEIDA TILLISY,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 5, 2024 Portland, Oregon
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: OWENS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and RAYES,** District Judge.
Muhammed Tillisy filed a pro se petition for nunc pro tunc designation after
he was convicted of fraud in state court, and fraud and supervision violations in
federal court. He…