United States v. Muhammed Tillisy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 202422-30144California1,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30144

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00269-RSL-1 v.

MUHAMMED ZBEIDA TILLISY, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30151

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:13-cr-00310-RSL-1 v. 2:13-cr-00310-RSL

MUHAMMED ZBEIDA TILLISY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 5, 2024 Portland, Oregon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: OWENS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and RAYES,** District Judge.

Muhammed Tillisy filed a pro se petition for nunc pro tunc designation after

he was convicted of fraud in state court, and fraud and supervision violations in

federal court. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.