Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL ARELLANO, No. 21-56249

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02412-CAB-MSB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

R. BLAHNIK,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Raul Arellano appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies his

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of access to courts. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error the district court’s factual

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). findings relevant to its exhaustion determination.…