United States v. Hugo Yanez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 202422-36056California1,027 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 6 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-36056
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 6:22-cv-00019-BMM 6:19-cr-00001-BMM- v.
HUGO YANEZ,
MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 26, 2024 Missoula, Montana
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and S.R. THOMAS and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Defendant-Appellant Hugo Yanez appeals the district court’s denial of his
§ 2255 habeas petition to reduce his sentence for conspiracy to distribute
methamphetamine. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Because the district court’s order was a final order that granted Yanez a certificate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. of appealability, we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We