Stephen Bafford v. Administrative Cmte. of the Northrop Grumman Plan

Good Law
101 F.4th 641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 202422-55634California7,362 words

Opinion

Opinion

Christen, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN H. BAFFORD; LAURA No. 22-55634

BAFFORD; EVELYN L. WILSON,

on their own behalves and on behalf of D.C. No. a class of similarly situated 2:18-cv-10219- participants and beneficiaries, ODW-E Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. OPINION

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

OF THE NORTHROP GRUMMAN

PENSION PLAN,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

NORTHROP GRUMMAN

CORPORATION; ALIGHT

SOLUTIONS LLC, FKA Hewitt Associates LLC, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding 2 BAFFORD V. ADMIN. COMM. OF THE NORTHROP GRUMMAN PLAN

Argued and Submitted October 17, 2023 San Francisco, California

Filed May 9, 2024

Before: Morgan Christen, Roopali H. Desai, and Anthony D. Johnstone, Circuit Judges. *

Opinion by Judge Christen

SUMMARY **

Employee Retirement Income Security Act

The panel reversed the district court’s dismissal of an action brought by pension plan participants, alleging that the plan administrator violated the Employee Retirement Income…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.