United States v. Steven Duarte
101 F.4th 657
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 202422-50048California21,416 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00387- v. AB-
STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 4, 2023 Pasadena, California
Filed May 9, 2024
Before: Carlos T. Bea, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Bea; Dissent by Judge M. Smith, Jr. SUMMARY *
Criminal Law/Second Amendment
Reversing the district court’s judgment, the panel vacated Steven Duarte’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which makes it a crime for any person to possess a firearm if he has been convicted of an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. On appeal, Duarte challenged his conviction on Second Amendment grounds, which the panel reviewed de novo rather than for plain error because Duarte had good cause for not raising the claim in the district court…