William Schroeder v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 202423-35606California483 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 9 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER SCHROEDER, No. 23-35606 an individual, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00172-MKD Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 7, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, BEA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

William Schroeder appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(1). Schroeder, an attorney who lives and is registered to vote in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the State of Washington, filed a pro se complaint in which he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.