Sara Ba v. US Department of Homeland Security Office of Equal

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202422-35933California473 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 10 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARA BA, No. 22-35933

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00720-MO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY OFFICE OF EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND

INCLUSION; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO

N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff Sara Ba appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action as a sanction for his discovery misconduct. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

37(b)(2)(A)(v). We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.