Charles Farnsworth v. Jeri Boe
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES VERDEL FARNSWORTH, No. 22-35805
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05067-BHS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JERI BOE, Clallam Bay Superintendent,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 9, 2024** Seattle, Washington
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Charles Farnsworth appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for first-degree robbery.
Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…