Charles Farnsworth v. Jeri Boe

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202422-35805California1,479 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES VERDEL FARNSWORTH, No. 22-35805

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05067-BHS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JERI BOE, Clallam Bay Superintendent,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 9, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Charles Farnsworth appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for first-degree robbery.

Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.