Min Kang v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202423-55488California583 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIN KANG, No. 23-55488 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00954-JWH-KK v.

MEMORANDUM*

BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 9, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, FORREST, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Min Kang appeals the district court’s dismissal of her

Second Amended Complaint against Bank of America, N.A. (BOA) with prejudice.

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Mahoney v. Sessions, 871 F.3d 873, 877 (9th Cir. 2017).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.