In Re: Kirk Brown v. Roxana Chamouille
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202423-60035California1,636 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: KIRK BROWN, No. 23-60035
Debtor, BAP No. 22-1244
------------------------------
MEMORANDUM*
KIRK BROWN,
Appellant,
v.
ROXANA K. CHAMOUILLE,
Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Faris, Lafferty III, and Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted May 8, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, FORREST, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Defendant-Debtor Kirk Brown appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (BAP) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment,
concluding that the debt Brown owes to Plaintiff-Appellee Roxana Chamouille is
nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). The debt arose after Brown refused
to vacate the…