In Re: Kirk Brown v. Roxana Chamouille

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202423-60035California1,636 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: KIRK BROWN, No. 23-60035

Debtor, BAP No. 22-1244

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

KIRK BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

ROXANA K. CHAMOUILLE,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Faris, Lafferty III, and Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted May 8, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, FORREST, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Debtor Kirk Brown appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (BAP) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment,

concluding that the debt Brown owes to Plaintiff-Appellee Roxana Chamouille is

nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). The debt arose after Brown refused

to vacate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.