Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.

Bad Law
101 F.4th 706
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 202422-15815California112 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of himself No. 22-15815 and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-06269-PJH Plaintiff-Appellant, Northern District of California, Oakland v.

ORDER

SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.;

SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Owens and Lee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this

case.