Villalta-Salazar

Villalta-Salazar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202421-953California1,063 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOAQUIN ERNESTO VILLALTA- No. 21-953 SALAZAR, Agency No.

A213-613-332

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: LEE and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, Senior District Judge.***

Joaquin Villalta-Salazar (Villalta), a native and citizen of El Salvador, seeks

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. an Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.