Hankins

United States v. Hankins

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202423-610California1,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 15 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-610 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:22-cr-00317-MC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANNE HANKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and W. FLETCHER and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Anne Hankins pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and one

count of money laundering. She now appeals the district court’s denial of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). evidentiary hearing. We dismiss Hankins’s appeal as barred by the appellate

waiver in her plea agreement. Alternatively, even if this appeal were not barred by

the appellate waiver, we conclude that the district court did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.