Buitron Vilcapoma v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 202423-2488California1,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HORACIO BUITRON VILCAPOMA, No. 23-2488 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-909-990 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: DESAI and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and GUTIERREZ, District Judge.***

Petitioner Horacio Max Buitron Vilcapoma (“Petitioner”), a native and

citizen of Peru, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. (“the Board”) adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of

Petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.