Kime

Kime v. Dignity Health, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2024A166748California5,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 3/29/24; Certified for Publication 4/25/24 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RYAN KIME,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A166748

v. DIGNITY HEALTH, INC., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC20586388) Defendant and Respondent.

Dr. Ryan Kime was the subject of a disciplinary proceeding by the Medical Board of California, which resulted in a public reprimand. While that proceeding was ongoing, Kime applied for privileges in the emergency department of two hospitals owned by Dignity Health, Inc. (Dignity). The hospitals stopped processing Kime’s application a few days after the effective date of the reprimand, and Kime subsequently sued Dignity for injunctive relief and damages, alleging that Dignity violated his common law and statutory rights by denying his application without offering him a hearing. Dignity moved for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication, arguing among other things that it had established a policy that it would not consider applicants with disciplinary histories for emergency department privileges, and that no hearing is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.