Flores
People v. Flores
Opinion
Opinion
Buchanan, J.
Filed 4/15/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D083310
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. INF1801453)
MANUEL DEJESUS FLORES,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside, Matthew C. Perantoni, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded with directions. Mark A. Hart, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Andrew S. Mestman and Arlene A. Sevidal, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Thirty years ago, our Supreme Court updated the so-called “fresh complaint” doctrine governing evidence of an extrajudicial disclosure made by the victim of a sexual offense. (People v. Brown (1994) 8 Cal.4th 746 (Brown).) Rejecting “outdated notions” that a sexual assault victim is normally expected to disclose the incident promptly (id. at p. 749), the court ruled that the “freshness” of the disclosure and its…