Masimo Corporation v. The Vanderpool Law Firm, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 2024G061829California3,204 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

The Vanderpool Law Firm (Vanderpool) appeals from an order awarding $10,000 in discovery sanctions against it and three defendants, John Bauche, BoundlessRise, LLC (Boundless), and Skyward Investments, LLC (Skyward). Vanderpool represented all three defendants in a lawsuit brought by Masimo Corporation based on Bauche’s misappropriation of corporate funds while he was a Masimo employee. The action was stayed twice, once while Bauche appealed from the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion and again to allow a federal criminal case against him to be resolved. Masimo was unsuccessful in obtaining substantive discovery responses from the defendants – instead of boilerplate objections – and finally moved to compel responses to interrogatories and document requests. The referee supervising discovery at this point recommended the motion to compel be granted and Masimo be awarded $10,000 in discovery sanctions. The trial court agreed and entered an order to that effect, awarding sanctions against Vanderpool and the three defendants. We affirm the order. Vanderpool’s main argument – that it had substituted out of the case as counsel before the motion to compel was filed and was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.