Petties

Petties v. Ackerman CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2024B328526California5,346 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/14/24 Petties v. Ackerman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

AKISHA PETTIES, B328526

Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 22CHRO01914)

ANDREW ACKERMAN,

Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Laura Streimer, Commissioner. Affirmed. Law Offices of Christian Contreras and Christian Contreras for Appellant. Akisha Petties, in pro. per., for Respondent. ________________________ Appellant Andrew Ackerman appeals from an order denying a motion to quash service of process and a restraining order under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA; Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.) for the protection of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.