Peters

Peters v. SDLA Courier Service CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2024B330142California1,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

SDLA is a delivery company in Southern California and “makes local-only deliveries in California for its clients.” One of its clients is Amazon Logistics, Inc. SDLA drivers pick up packages at Amazon warehouses in California and deliver them locally to customers. Peters worked for SDLA from September 2018 to July 2019. She was hired as a delivery driver and also worked as a dispatcher.1 She, like other SDLA delivery drivers, only picked up and delivered packages within California. When Peters was hired, she signed a Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims (Agreement). The Agreement requires that the employee and employer arbitrate all claims or controversies. It states: “[T]he Company is engaged in transactions involving interstate commerce and . . . my employment involves such commerce. As such, I acknowledge that this Agreement is subject to the Federal Arbitration Act.” Peters filed a lawsuit against SDLA, asserting individual and putative class claims for alleged wage and hour violations. SDLA moved to compel arbitration of her individual claims.2 SDLA argued that the FAA applied to the Agreement and that the transportation worker exemption under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.