Kaur

Kaur v. Pabla CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2024F086273California5,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/14/24 Kaur v. Pabla CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JASWINDER KAUR et al.,

F086273

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Merced Super. Ct. v. No. 20CV-03476)

GURIT PABLA et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. Brian McCabe, Judge. HBG Law and Harry B. Gill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Fores Macko Johnston & Chartrand, Cory B. Chartrand and Megan D. Johnson for Defendant and Respondent Dual Arch International, Inc. No appearance on behalf of Defendants and Respondents Gurit Pabla, Gursharan Pabla, Tarjender Pabla, ECP, LP, and BN Capital Management, Inc. -ooOoo- This matter stems from a foreclosure sale that was successfully challenged and set aside by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.