American Express National Bank v. Vaca CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2024A168165California1,791 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/30/24 American Express National Bank v. Vaca CA1/2 Received for posting on 5/14/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL

BANK,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A168165

v. (Alameda County EDWARD VACA, Super. Ct. No. 22CV005110) Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

This appeal arises out of a credit card debt collection action. Representing himself, defendant Edward Vaca (Vaca) challenges a judgment entered after the trial court granted plaintiff American Express National Bank’s (American Express) motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal as untimely. On January 10, 2022, American Express…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.