P.v. Jackson CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2024G061646California2,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

Delaney, J.

FACTS

I. Procedural History

In a first amended information, appellant and co-defendant Dejon Vincent Griffin were charged with the murder and attempted robbery of Maher Yousef on July 1, 2016. It was alleged as a special circumstance that the murder was committed during the attempted robbery, and that the defendants each personally used a firearm during the commission of the attempted robbery. It was further alleged that both defendants suffered a prior strike conviction under the Three Strikes law and a prior serious felony conviction. The case against appellant and Griffin was consolidated with the case against Jeffrey Tuli, who was charged with the murder of Yousef in a separately filed information. The consolidated case was tried before two juries: one jury for appellant and Griffin, and the other for Tuli. On March 24, 2022, an Orange County jury found appellant guilty of murder and found true the allegation that he was a “major participant with reckless

2 indifference to human life while engaged in the commission or attempted commission” of robbery. It also found appellant guilty of attempted robbery and found true the personal firearm use enhancement. In a bifurcated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.