Matthes

Matthes v. Rodgers CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2024B322759California13,353 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 5/13/24 Matthes v. Rodgers CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

CHRISTIN MATTHES, B322759

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC702531) v.

LYNDSY RODGERS, et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order and judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Holly Fujie, Judge. Affirmed. Kaedian, Katherine C. McBroom, Henry L. Whitehead for Defendants and Appellants. RMO, Sean D. Muntz for Plaintiff and Respondent. Respondent Christin Matthes was an au pair for appellants Christian Rodgers and Lyndsy Rodgers.1 On respondent’s last day with the Rodgers family, Christian attempted to film her while she was showering. In addition to pressing criminal charges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.