James Gray v. amazon.com Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202423-35377California1,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES GRAY; SCOTT HORTON, No. 23-35377

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00800-BJR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMAZON.COM INC, a Delaware corporation; AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Washington limited liability company,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 7, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: FORREST and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and DONATO,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Plaintiffs James Gray and Scott Horton are owners and users of Alexa-

enabled devices. They alleged that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.