Tarin

Tarin v. Tarin CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2024B330854California3,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/16/24 Tarin v. Tarin CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

DOLORES TARIN, B330854

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BQ052232) v.

JESSE TARIN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Dennis F. Hernandez, Commissioner. Affirmed.

Barbaro, Chinen, Pitzer & Duke and Raimund Freihube for Plaintiff and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

_________________________ In February 2023, appellant Dolores Tarin sought to renew a domestic violence restraining order first obtained in 2016 against her brother, respondent Jesse Tarin, after he engaged in physical violence against her. The trial court found that Dolores1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.