Stanley Rimer v. Renee Baker
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202422-16270California462 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STANLEY RIMER, No. 22-16270
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-CSD v.
RENEE BAKER, Warden; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 1, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,** Chief District Judge.
Stanley Rimer appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254
petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he claimed misjoinder of charges and
defendants in his state criminal trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. and 2253(a) and affirm.