Stanley Rimer v. Renee Baker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202422-16270California462 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANLEY RIMER, No. 22-16270

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-CSD v.

RENEE BAKER, Warden; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 1, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,** Chief District Judge.

Stanley Rimer appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he claimed misjoinder of charges and

defendants in his state criminal trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. and 2253(a) and affirm.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.