Soriano Ruiz v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202423-368California865 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISMELDA PATRICIA SORIANO No. 23-368 RUIZ; YEIMI MISCHEL RIVERA Agency Nos.

SORIANO; BRITNEY DAYANA A202-097-278

SORIANO RUIZ, A202-097-279

A202-097-280

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 6, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Ismelda Patricia Soriano Ruiz (“Soriano Ruiz”) and her two children Britney

and Yeimi petition for review of a February 17, 2023 final order of removal by the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). In prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.