Richards

United States v. Richards

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202423-2868California567 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2868 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00039-MCE-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARK A. RICHARDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, CALLAHAN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Mark A. Richards appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion for compassionate relief. Richards pleaded guilty to advertising child

pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2551(d), and was sentenced to 210 months

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). imprisonment. After serving approximately thirty percent of his sentence,

Richards moved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.